Google
Web TxDirector.com
 User Login:  Username:    Password:      Forgot It?  | Register  | Subscribe
Home
Recent Feedback
Contact
Topics
Categories
Site Map
About TxDirector:
RSS Feed (New)
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
You are here: TxDirector > >
The Cost-Effectiveness of Alcohol Interventions
Topics: Administrator's Corner > Funding and Fiscal | Of Interest To Everyone > Advocacy
2005-11-13 | Post Feedback! | Send To a Friend | Print Version | Send Me Responses | Related
Healthcare systems and funding agencies often use cost-effectiveness data to make resource-allocation decisions about which treatment options to offer patients. Two recent reviews illustrated different approaches to cost-effectiveness analysis as applied to alcohol interventions.


In the first study, researchers used computer simulation models and published data from alcohol intervention trials to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness (CE) ratio (i.e., dollars* needed for each quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) of several approaches to treating problem drinking and alcohol dependence.


Various brief interventions for problem drinking yielded CE ratios of $62 to $505 per QALY (compared with no intervention).
Motivation enhancement therapy (MET), which focuses on motivation and commitment to change, yielded CE ratios of $1613 to $2531 per QALY (compared with an initial assessment, feedback, and education).
Naltrexone plus counseling for severe alcohol dependence yielded a CE ratio of $9750 per QALY (compared with placebo plus counseling).
In the second study, researchers performed a cost-effectiveness analysis within a randomized clinical trial of MET (n=347) versus social behavior and network therapy (n=261) for alcohol problems. They collected data on treatment costs,** health and societal resources use, and QALYs.

The more expensive social behavior and network therapy yielded the same number of QALYs as did MET.
Social behavior and network therapy cost $331 on average and yielded a net reduction in resource use of $1195 whereas MET cost $193 on average and yielded a net reduction of $888.

Comments:

In the first study, the CE ratios for most interventions studied were well below what purchasers of healthcare commonly pay to treat other diseases (e.g., $50,000 to $100,000 per QALY). In the second study, the social behavior and network therapy program was more expensive, but no more effective, than was MET. Regardless, both therapies saved about 5 times as much in health and societal resources use as they cost to deliver.

Kevin L. Kraemer, MD, MSc


*For purposes of this summary, 2003 Australian dollars were converted to 2003 US dollars using historical exchange rates.

**For purposes of this summary, 2001 UK pounds were converted to 2001 US dollars using historical exchange rates.

About The Author:
More information at :
http://www.bu.edu/act/alcoholandhealth/issues/issue_nov05/kraemer_mortimer.htm

Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence

Previous: Consumers in Health Care: The Burden of Choice Administrator's Corner Next: Powerful Conversations - Five Elements for Becoming a Stronger Change Leader
Feedback Forum:
No Feedback Yet.
Post Feedback:
Login using the form on the top of the page to post feedback if you have registered with TxDirector. If you have not yet registered, click here. Registration is free.
Related Links
Categories:
About These Links: The links above are dynamically generated. Some links may be more relevant than others.
(1x1 graphic )
© 2005 TxDirector.com - Maintained by Lanstat Incorporated - Design by Cumuli Design
Page Load Time: 0.094 secs
Disclaimer: TxDirector.com cannot accept any responsibility for any injury or damage that you may cause to yourself, others, or property when following any advice given on this site. TxDirector.com has no control of how you may use information you get from this site and does not attest to the validity of any information found within. Much of this information comes from third parties (newsletter readers and other contributors). Use advice found in our newsletters and on our site with common sense and at your own risk. If you see something in our newsletters or on our site that you disagree with, please let us know. Our goal is print only valuable information and advice. If you find any information on TxDirector.com or in our newsletters that is either erroneous and/or potentially harmful to others, please Contact Us, immediately.